Dear Editor:
I feel the need to comment on the two page photo article titled “On the House” in the December 19 issue. In this article, the author commented on holiday home decorations and displays around town, and although the author made a reference to traditions, legends, and folklore, the Christmas tree was called a “one of the holiday season’s most identifiable- and Pagan- symbols”. I do know that many symbols used today do have their origins in pagan religions. I found that the peace sign so popular in the 70’s, the wedding band, and the heart all are examples of this. However, I don’t think that those of us who use those symbols would classify them as pagan as used in modern times. In my opinion, it would have been more accurate, if the author was somehow compelled to make that pagan reference at all, to write that the tree was of pagan origin and has crossed over into the Christian and secular world. As written, I find it offensive.
When researching this, I found that the Christmas tree was, in early Christianity, still considered pagan. But St. Boniface changed that, as did Martin Luther. The tree tradition was brought here from Germany. Now we see Christmas trees everywhere- in banks, churches, homes, businesses, and in town plazas. The Christmas tree is a touch o color and life in the dark winter days. It is a tradition that brings families together to decorate. It makes children happy. It is enjoyed by many, Christian and non-Christian. It is a perfectly innocent, warm, and beautiful tradition beloved by many.
Lorraine Frank